🔗 Share this article

Australia's decisive policy to ban social platforms access for individuals under sixteen is sending ripples around the globe. Officials, safety advocates, and guardians are monitoring with great interest to see if this tactic will become a template for other nations.

Across Europe Movement

Across Europe, a rising number of countries are moving toward parallel restrictions.

• Denmark has announced a ban on social media for under-15s, with the PM arguing that mobile devices and platforms are "taking away our youngsters' innocence". Legislation may be formalized next year.
• Norway is set to enforce a access barrier of 15, pointing to the need to protect young people from the "manipulative force of the recommendation systems".
• Ireland is working on a online verification tool to authenticate the user details of social media users. Officials have indicated that an similar ban is "a potential measures in reserve".
• In Spain, the prime minister has asked parliament to pass a law raising the minimum age for joining social media to 16.
• In France, the head of state has floated the idea of a ban for children below 15, and a government panel has recommended a related move, including an overnight "digital curfew" for older teenagers.
• The administration in the Netherlands has advised families to restrict their children from social media until 15.

Across the European Union, the EU parliament has approved a advisory resolution supporting a ban for teenagers under 16 without parental consent is granted. Even though it warns of the "compulsive" nature of these apps, the move does not enact binding law.

"An effective age limit is a useful starting point," commented one European lawmaker behind the measure.

Britain: A Watchful Approach

For the United Kingdom, the administration has kept open a potential ban, arguing that "nothing is discarded" but maintaining any policy must be "grounded in conclusive data".

Last year, support built behind a proposal to enact limits on social media use by teenagers, but it was in the end weakened. However, the government vowed to conduct more studies the topic.

Advocacy groups have expressed concerns. A prominent charity founded by the loved ones of a young person who died after being exposed to harmful platform posts suggests that a strict age ban might not make platforms safer and could create a "dangerous transition" of exposure when users reach the legal age.

"Australia's ban is a answer to the failure of the tech sector to create products and services that are appropriate and suitable for minors," commented a influential peer.

America: A Decentralized Picture

In the United States, regulation is primarily occurring at the local level against a backdrop of national gridlock.

• The state of Utah mandates guardian permission for those under 18 to use social media and limits nighttime use.
• Florida has enacted a measure prohibiting under-14s from creating accounts on social media, though it is subject to court battles.
• Virginia has passed a rule restricting under-16s to 60 minutes of social media use per day, with extra access dependent on adult consent.
• The state of Georgia, Tennessee, and Louisiana have also passed bills mandating guardian approval for teenagers to open social media presences.

Despite cross-party agreement and proposals from some politicians to follow the Australian path, a federal ban is presently seen as unlikely.

International Views

Outside of the West, additional states are likewise taking action.

• The Malaysian government aims to restrict social media for teenagers effective next year.
• Brazil has lifted the access age for Instagram to 16.

But, global bodies adopt a more cautious tone. The UN children's agency has warned that social media bans carry risks and "may even backfire". The body points out that social networks can be a "critical link" for vulnerable youth and that bans should not be a "excuse" for tech companies to invest in child safeguards.

As this worldwide discussion continues, the steps of Australia and others indicate that states globally are no longer content to delay for tech companies to make changes on their own.